SatelliteHR e2e — issues found

SHR-008 · a day with a full day of hours is not marked Half day

Error: 2026-10-09: 10.5 h worked (half day is below 4 h) but the day reads "half_day"

expect(received).not.toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: not "half_day"

• ✓ SHR-008 · signing out while on the clock offers to clock out first tests/feedback/attendance/attendance-journeys.spec.ts:16
• ✓ SHR-008 · the clock in / clock out control is on screen for the employee tests/feedback/attendance/attendance-pr.spec.ts:18
• ✓ SHR-008 · worked hours are captured from the punches (first in to last out, less the break) tests/feedback/attendance/attendance-pr.spec.ts:28
• ✗ SHR-008 · a day with a full day of hours is not marked Half day tests/feedback/attendance/attendance-pr.spec.ts:40

SHR-014 · days before the employee joined are not offered for correction

Error: QA Employee One joined on 2026-10-01; the calendar still offers these earlier days for correction (the server then refuses them)

expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality

- Expected  -  1
+ Received  + 23

- Array []
+ Array [
+   "Tuesday 1 September: no attendance recorded — request a correction",
+   "Wednesday 2 September: no attendance recorded — request a correction",
+   "Thursday 3 September: no attendance recorded — request a correction",
+   "Monday 7 September: no attendance recorded — request a correction",
+   "Tuesday 8 September: no attendance recorded — request a correction",
+   "Wednesday 9 September: no attendance recorded — request a correction",
+   "Thursday 10 September: no attendance recorded — request a correction",
+   "Friday 11 September: no attendance recorded — request a correction",
+   "Monday 14 September: no attendance recorded — request a correction",
+   "Tuesday 15 September: no attendance recorded — request a correction",
+   "Wednesday 16 September: no attendance recorded — request a correction",
+   "Thursday 17 September: no attendance recorded — request a correction",
+   "Friday 18 September: no attendance recorded — request a correction",
+   "Monday 21 September: no attendance recorded — request a correction",
+   "Tuesday 22 September: no attendance recorded — request a correction",
+   "Wednesday 23 September: no attendance recorded — request a correction",
+   "Thursday 24 September: no attendance recorded — request a correction",
+   "Friday 25 September: no attendance recorded — request a correction",
+   "Monday 28 September: no attendance recorded — request a correction",
+   "Tuesday 29 September: no attendance recorded — request a correction",
+   "Wednesday 30 September: no attendance recorded — request a correction",
+ ]

• ✓ SHR-014 · every past working day of the month can be corrected straight from the calendar tests/feedback/attendance/attendance-pr.spec.ts:52
• ✗ SHR-014 · days before the employee joined are not offered for correction tests/feedback/attendance/attendance-pr.spec.ts:71

SHR-069 · FLOATING-HOLIDAYS is not credited before the employee completes 30 days

Error: credits inside the first 30 days

expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality

- Expected  - 1
+ Received  + 4

- Array []
+ Array [
+   "e2 (joined 2026-10-01): +2.00 on 2026-10-09 (policy_entitlement:2026)",
+   "e3 (joined 2026-10-01): +2.00 on 2026-10-09 (policy_entitlement:2026)",
+ ]

SHR-069 · PAID-TIME-OFF-PTO is not credited before the employee completes 30 days

Error: credits inside the first 30 days

expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality

- Expected  - 1
+ Received  + 4

- Array []
+ Array [
+   "e2 (joined 2026-10-01): +1.25 on 2026-10-09 (policy_entitlement:2026-10)",
+   "e3 (joined 2026-10-01): +1.25 on 2026-10-09 (policy_entitlement:2026-10)",
+ ]

SHR-069 · special leaves (bereavement, maternity, examination, paternity) are never credited automatically

Error: employees holding automatically accrued special leave, e.g. Aarav Krishnamurthy.: BLE accrued 10; Aarav Krishnamurthy.: EXAMINATION-LEAVE accrued 5; Aarav Krishnamurthy.: MATERNITY-LEAVE accrued 182; Aarav Krishnamurthy.: PATERNITY-LEAVE accrued 5; Aditya Ranganathan: BLE accrued 10; Aditya Ranganathan: EXAMINATION-LEAVE accrued 5

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: 0
Received: 156

• ✗ SHR-069 · FLOATING-HOLIDAYS is not credited before the employee completes 30 days tests/feedback/leave/leave-rules.spec.ts:267
• ✗ SHR-069 · PAID-TIME-OFF-PTO is not credited before the employee completes 30 days tests/feedback/leave/leave-rules.spec.ts:267
• ✗ SHR-069 · special leaves (bereavement, maternity, examination, paternity) are never credited automatically tests/feedback/leave/leave-rules.spec.ts:279

SHR-123 · Reports offers Attendance (and leave / loss of pay) as a module

Error: admin: Reports modules are Employees (employees), Announcements (announcements), Assets (assets), Reviews (performance), Goals (performance), Exit cases (exit), Transfers (transfers), Onboarding (onboarding), Asset movements (assets), Form responses (templates) — no Attendance

expect(received).not.toEqual(expected) // deep equality

Expected: not []

SHR-123 · the monthly attendance report shows leave by type and loss of pay, one row per employee

Error: muster columns: Employee No, Employee, Department, Present, WFH / on duty, Half day, Absent, Leave, Holiday / weekly off, Worked hours, OT hours — no loss-of-pay column

expect(received).not.toEqual(expected) // deep equality

Expected: not []

• ✗ SHR-123 · Reports offers Attendance (and leave / loss of pay) as a module tests/feedback/attendance/attendance-pr.spec.ts:185
• ✗ SHR-123 · the monthly attendance report shows leave by type and loss of pay, one row per employee tests/feedback/attendance/attendance-pr.spec.ts:195

SHR-124 · one leave report has employee details, from/to dates, opening, accrual and closing balance, and approval status

Error: no single download has every column — leave-requests-pending-2026-10-15.csv: missing opening balance, accrual, closing balance | leave-balances-2026-10-15.csv: missing from date, to date, approval status

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: true
Received: false

• ✗ SHR-124 · one leave report has employee details, from/to dates, opening, accrual and closing balance, and approval status tests/feedback/leave/leave-rules.spec.ts:357

SHR-004 · an employee created from Organization gets the same pre-boarding checklist as a recruitment hire

Error: FB Test Org Joiner Cacgbabf (created from Organization, joining today) has an onboarding record — instead there is none, so no pre-boarding checklist was started

expect(received).toBeGreaterThan(expected)

Expected: > 0
Received:   0

• ✗ SHR-004 · an employee created from Organization gets the same pre-boarding checklist as a recruitment hire tests/feedback/onboarding/new-joiner.spec.ts:50

SHR-005 · a joiner starting today gets document-collection tasks

Error: document collection is triggered for FB Test Org Joiner Cacgbabf on the joining day — instead no document task exists (no onboarding record at all)

expect(received).not.toHaveLength(expected)

Expected length: not 0
Received array:      []

SHR-005 · the joiner’s pending onboarding tasks show on the owners’ Home

Error: an HR owner (HR Manager, HR Head or HR SPOC) has FB Test Org Joiner Cacgbabf's onboarding tasks under "Your onboarding tasks" — instead none of them does

expect(received).not.toHaveLength(expected)

Expected length: not 0
Received array:      []

• ✗ SHR-005 · a joiner starting today gets document-collection tasks tests/feedback/onboarding/new-joiner.spec.ts:58
• ✗ SHR-005 · the joiner’s pending onboarding tasks show on the owners’ Home tests/feedback/onboarding/new-joiner.spec.ts:64

SHR-006 · the Employees list says "Can sign in" only for people whose sign-in actually works

Error: "Can sign in" shown for people who never accepted their invitation or have no account here

expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality

- Expected  -  1
+ Received  + 16

- Array []
+ Array [
+   "Abhishek Kumar (account: none in this company)",
+   "Aditya Ranganathan (account: invited)",
+   "Anant (account: invited)",
+   "Kabir Anand (account: none in this company)",
+   "Meera Kulkarni (account: invited)",
+   "Neera bv.aj (account: invited)",
+   "OBT Invite Bulk (account: invited)",
+   "OBT Invite Failure (account: invited)",
+   "Onboarding Management (account: invited)",
+   "Pramod Singh (account: invited)",
+   "Probe Leaver (Demo) (account: invited)",
+   "Rhea Menon (Demo) (account: invited)",
+   "Ritika Chourasia (account: invited)",
+   "Role Test (account: invited)",
+ ]

• ✓ SHR-006 · the reviewer's three test employees received working sign-ins tests/feedback/employee-creation/positions-import-access.spec.ts:128
• ✗ SHR-006 · the Employees list says "Can sign in" only for people whose sign-in actually works tests/feedback/employee-creation/positions-import-access.spec.ts:139

SHR-007 · New joinees does not show onboarding “Complete” while nothing has been done

Error: the Onboarding column reflects that no onboarding task is done (API: status null, 0/0 tasks) — instead it says "Complete"

expect(received).not.toMatch(expected)

Expected pattern: not /^Complete$/
Received string:      "Complete"

• ✗ SHR-007 · New joinees does not show onboarding “Complete” while nothing has been done tests/feedback/onboarding/new-joiner.spec.ts:76

SHR-009 · the profile opened from search shows the employee's position, location and manager

Error: the header shows "Delivery Manager" (not "No position")

expect(locator).toHaveText(expected) failed

Locator: locator('#main-content').getByText(/Delivery Manager|No position/).first()
Expected pattern: /Delivery Manager/
Received string:  "No position · Operations"
Timeout: 30000ms

Call log:
  - the header shows "Delivery Manager" (not "No position") locator('#main-content').getByText(/Delivery Manager|No position/).first() with timeout 30000ms
  - waiting for locator('#main-content').getByText(/Delivery Manager|No position/).first()
    63 × locator resolved to <p class="mt-0.5 text-sm text-ink-2">No position · Operations</p>
       - unexpected value "No position · Operations"

SHR-009 · a reporting manager can find their own team member in global search

Error: QA Manager's search answers 403 {"code":"FORBIDDEN","message":"You do not have permission to do this","requiredPermission":["settings.saved_searches.view"],"requestId":"c9e4d046-7c69-4b6e-9551

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: 200
Received: 403

• ✓ SHR-009 · clicking an employee found in global search opens their profile without an error tests/feedback/organization/organization.spec.ts:22
• ✗ SHR-009 · the profile opened from search shows the employee's position, location and manager tests/feedback/organization/organization.spec.ts:37
• ✗ SHR-009 · a reporting manager can find their own team member in global search tests/feedback/organization/organization.spec.ts:53

SHR-013 · the IT team gets the IT checklist for a joiner starting today

Error: QA IT has FB Test Org Joiner Cacgbabf's IT checklist (Home "Your onboarding tasks" or Inbox) on the joining day — instead it has nothing

expect(received).toBeGreaterThan(expected)

Expected: > 0
Received:   0

• ✗ SHR-013 · the IT team gets the IT checklist for a joiner starting today tests/feedback/onboarding/new-joiner.spec.ts:90
• ✓ SHR-013 · once onboarding starts, IT is notified and has the IT items on Home tests/feedback/onboarding/new-joiner.spec.ts:98

SHR-033 · no recruitment hire sits in onboarding with an empty 0/0 checklist

Error: HR SPOC can see which checklist a joiner gets (no "(unavailable)" picker: the checklist list returns 403 templates.view)

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: 0
Received: 1

• ✓ SHR-033 · started with the stakeholder checklist, each stakeholder gets their own items tests/feedback/onboarding/new-joiner.spec.ts:112
• ✗ SHR-033 · no recruitment hire sits in onboarding with an empty 0/0 checklist tests/feedback/onboarding/onboarding-board.spec.ts:63

SHR-039 · an employee can hold more than one role (e.g. HR Manager and Reporting Manager)

Error: both roles stay selected; the Role field shows "Reporting Manager"

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: true
Received: false

SHR-039 · Settings → Roles lets a user be a member of a second role

Error: adding someone to a role keeps the roles they already hold

expect(locator).toHaveCount(expected) failed

Locator:  getByRole('dialog').last().getByText(/One role per user/i)
Expected: 0
Received: 1
Timeout:  30000ms

Call log:
  - adding someone to a role keeps the roles they already hold getByRole('dialog').last().getByText(/One role per user/i) with timeout 30000ms
  - waiting for getByRole('dialog').last().getByText(/One role per user/i)
    63 × locator resolved to 1 element
       - unexpected value "1"

• ✗ SHR-039 · an employee can hold more than one role (e.g. HR Manager and Reporting Manager) tests/feedback/employee-creation/positions-import-access.spec.ts:92
• ✗ SHR-039 · Settings → Roles lets a user be a member of a second role tests/feedback/employee-creation/positions-import-access.spec.ts:103

SHR-061 · the notice period comes from the employee’s location: 60 days in India

Error: an employee in India gets a 60-day notice period — instead the form says "Your 30-day notice ends 14 Nov 2026."

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: "60"
Received: "30"

SHR-061 · notice periods are set per jurisdiction (India 60 days, other countries 14)

Error: notice periods can differ by location/jurisdiction — instead there is one company-wide "noticePeriodDays": 30

expect(received).toBeTruthy()

Received: null

SHR-061 · approvals and notifications reach every exit stakeholder as soon as someone resigns

Error: every exit stakeholder hears of FB Test Org Leaver Cacgbabf's resignation — these got nothing

expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality

- Expected  - 1
+ Received  + 7

- Array []
+ Array [
+   "HR Head",
+   "HR SPOC",
+   "IT",
+   "Accounts / Finance",
+   "Admin",
+ ]

SHR-061 · the notification fits the requested last working day

Error: with the last day today, the manager is not asked to hold a stay conversation within two working days

expect(received).not.toMatch(expected)

Expected pattern: not /within (two|2) working days|within 48 hours/i
Received string:      "Please hold the stay conversation within two working days — FB Test Org Leaver Cacgbabf has resigned, with Thursday 15 October as the last working day. Please hold the stay conversation within 2 working days and record it on the exit: the reasons, the knowledge-loss risk, and whether a counteroffer is worth considering. || FB Test Org Leaver Cacgbabf has resigned — FB Test Org Leaver Cacgbabf has submitted a resignation. Please hold the stay conversation within 48 hours and record it on the exit; it is worth having even when the decision looks settled. Open the exit: https://satellite-hr-frontend-final-restructure.polished-mud-fefe.workers.dev/company/82628593-49b6-4dad-ad2a-6b9472ab44fc/me/inbox"

• ✓ SHR-061 · the exit module is open to employees tests/feedback/exit/exit-forms.spec.ts:62
• ✗ SHR-061 · the notice period comes from the employee’s location: 60 days in India tests/feedback/exit/exit-forms.spec.ts:70
• ✗ SHR-061 · notice periods are set per jurisdiction (India 60 days, other countries 14) tests/feedback/exit/exit-forms.spec.ts:82
• ✗ SHR-061 · approvals and notifications reach every exit stakeholder as soon as someone resigns tests/feedback/exit/resignation-journey.spec.ts:55
• ✗ SHR-061 · the notification fits the requested last working day tests/feedback/exit/resignation-journey.spec.ts:63

SHR-063 · an employee can see and complete their own onboarding details

Error: the employee can read their own record (joining, onboarding, probation)

expect(received).not.toMatch(expected)

Expected pattern: not /not open to the workforce|you cannot/i
Received string:      "Your record Joining, onboarding, probation, every move and every manager since — the whole timeline. It is kept in the lifecycle module, which is not open to the workforce yet, so your People team can read it and you cannot. Ask them for anything you need in the meantime."

• ✗ SHR-063 · an employee can see and complete their own onboarding details tests/feedback/onboarding/orientation-and-self-service.spec.ts:54

SHR-090 · the probation confirmation form lists the seven evaluation criteria

Error: a confirmation question set covers every criterion — the closest, "confirmation-review", lacks these

expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality

- Expected  - 1
+ Received  + 8

- Array []
+ Array [
+   "Communication skills: verbal / written",
+   "Job knowledge",
+   "Initiative in learning new skills",
+   "Application of skills to the current job",
+   "Effective problem solving",
+   "Interpersonal skills (superiors, peers, subordinates)",
+ ]

SHR-090 · each criterion takes a self rating, a rating and a comment

Error: a question can carry the employee's self rating (answer types offered: Rating 1–5, Written answer, Yes / no)

expect(received).toMatch(expected)

Expected pattern: /self.?rating|self.?assessment/i
Received string:  "Rating 1–5 | Written answer | Yes / no New question set·
Name the set and add the questions each review will ask.·
Name
1
Rating 1–5
Required
Scored
Add question
Cancel
1 question empty"
Error: a rated question can also take a comment

expect(received).toMatch(expected)

Expected pattern: /comment/i
Received string:  "Rating 1–5 | Written answer | Yes / no New question set·
Name the set and add the questions each review will ask.·
Name
1
Rating 1–5
Required
Scored
Add question
Cancel
1 question empty"

SHR-090 · the Reporting Manager, the Department Head and the HR Head each review the form

Error: a step goes to the HR Head (not "any one of" the HR partners)

expect(received).toMatch(expected)

Expected pattern: /HR Head/
Received string:  "· Primary Manager: unresolved | · Department Head, or HR | · HR Partner · any one of 14"

• ✗ SHR-090 · the probation confirmation form lists the seven evaluation criteria tests/feedback/confirmation/probation-form.spec.ts:21
• ✗ SHR-090 · each criterion takes a self rating, a rating and a comment tests/feedback/confirmation/probation-form.spec.ts:32
• ✗ SHR-090 · the Reporting Manager, the Department Head and the HR Head each review the form tests/feedback/confirmation/probation-form.spec.ts:50

SHR-096 · changing the calculated relieving date asks for a reason for the change

Error: moving the date adds a mandatory "reason for the change" field (the form only has: Last working day* | Reason*)

expect(received).toBeGreaterThan(expected)

Expected: > 1
Received:   1

SHR-096 · HR can start an exit for any employee

Error: every active employee can be picked (36 offered of 72 active; the picker loads only the first 50 employees) — these can't

expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality

- Expected  -  1
+ Received  + 38

- Array []
+ Array [
+   "Pramod Singh",
+   "Preboarding Flowtest",
+   "Priyasha Nair",
+   "Probe Candidate",
+   "QA Accounts",
+   "QA Admin",
+   "QA Buddy",
+   "QA Department Head",
+   "QA DevOps",
+   "QA Employee One",
+   "QA Employee Two",
+   "QA HR Head",
+   "QA HR Manager",
+   "QA HR SPOC",
+   "QA IT",
+   "QA JSM",
+   "QA Manager",
+   "Raju Rastogi",
+   "Ritika Bhatia",
+   "Ritika Chourasia",
+   "Rohan Gendercheck",
+   "Rohan Patwardhan",
+   "Role Test",
+   "Sameer Khan",
+   "Siya",
+   "Sneha Vaidyanathan",
+   "Tarun Abraham",
+   "Test Department Head",
+   "Test Hiring Manager",
+   "Test HR Head",
+   "Test Interviewer One",

SHR-096 · the exit form takes the resignation date and works out the relieving date

Error: the form asks for the resignation date

expect(received).toMatch(expected)

Expected pattern: /Resignation date/i
Received string:  "Employee | Last working day | Initiation"

SHR-096 · the forms say “Relieving date”, not “Last working day”

Error: HR Start exit says "Relieving date"

expect(received).not.toMatch(expected)

Expected pattern: not /Last working day/i
Received string:      "Start an exit

Opens the exit-approval flow, the clearance lanes, and a knowledge-transfer plan. Payroll lock defaults to five days before the last day.

Employee
Pick an employee
Last working day
Pick the last day
Initiation
Resignation
Cancel
Start exit"
Error: the employee Resign form says "Relieving date"

expect(received).not.toMatch(expected)

Expected pattern: not /Last working day/i
Received string:      "Resign

This starts your exit. Your approvers are notified as soon as you submit.

Last working day*
14 Nov 2026

Your 30-day notice ends 14 Nov 2026.

Reason*

Seen by your approvers.

Cancel
Submit resignation"

• ✗ SHR-096 · changing the calculated relieving date asks for a reason for the change tests/feedback/exit/exit-forms.spec.ts:89
• ✗ SHR-096 · HR can start an exit for any employee tests/feedback/exit/exit-forms.spec.ts:104
• ✗ SHR-096 · the exit form takes the resignation date and works out the relieving date tests/feedback/exit/exit-forms.spec.ts:119
• ✗ SHR-096 · the forms say “Relieving date”, not “Last working day” tests/feedback/exit/exit-forms.spec.ts:129

SHR-105 · the phone country code list covers more than India and the US

Error: country codes offered: IN +91, US +1

expect(received).toBeGreaterThan(expected)

Expected: > 2
Received:   2

• ✗ SHR-105 · the phone country code list covers more than India and the US tests/feedback/employee-creation/new-employee-form.spec.ts:138

SHR-107 · with a US phone number the emergency contact must use the same country code

Error: a US employee phone with an Indian (+91) emergency phone is refused — instead the form sent it and the server accepted every field (it only refused the employee number the test swapped in, so nothing was saved)

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: true
Received: false

• ✗ SHR-107 · with a US phone number the emergency contact must use the same country code tests/feedback/employee-creation/new-employee-form.spec.ts:161

SHR-108 · after picking a jurisdiction, Location offers only locations in that jurisdiction

Error: with California picked, Location offers only California's locations (Los Angeles); it offers Ahmedabad - Remote, Demo – Bengaluru Office, Hyderabad HQ, Los Angeles, Remote - India

expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality

- Expected  - 0
+ Received  + 4

  Array [
+   "Ahmedabad - Remote",
+   "Demo – Bengaluru Office",
+   "Hyderabad HQ",
    "Los Angeles",
+   "Remote - India",
  ]

SHR-108 · every jurisdiction offered for employees has at least one location in it

Error: jurisdictions on the New employee form with no location to pick

expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality

- Expected  - 1
+ Received  + 3

- Array []
+ Array [
+   "Tamil Nadu",
+ ]

• ✗ SHR-108 · after picking a jurisdiction, Location offers only locations in that jurisdiction tests/feedback/employee-creation/new-employee-form.spec.ts:83
• ✗ SHR-108 · every jurisdiction offered for employees has at least one location in it tests/feedback/employee-creation/new-employee-form.spec.ts:94

SHR-010 · Home “Pending approvals” says what is being approved, not just who asked

Error: Home card for "Missed punch · 8 Oct" reads: "Pending approvals / View all / QO / QA Employee One / QA Employee One / FA / Fbtest Candidate ageaah / FB Test Pipeline 1015064007 · offer OFR-2026-0083 / FA / Fbtest Candidate afdbff / FB Test Pipeline 1015053155 · offer OFR-2026-0082 / FA / Fbtest Candidate adejaj / FB Test Pipeline 1015034909 · offer OFR-2026-0081" — it names the requester only, not the request

expect(received).toContain(expected) // indexOf

Expected substring: "Missed punch"
Received string:    "Pending approvals / View all / QO / QA Employee One / QA Employee One / FA / Fbtest Candidate ageaah / FB Test Pipeline 1015064007 · offer OFR-2026-0083 / FA / Fbtest Candidate afdbff / FB Test Pipeline 1015053155 · offer OFR-2026-0082 / FA / Fbtest Candidate adejaj / FB Test Pipeline 1015034909 · offer OFR-2026-0081"

• ✗ SHR-010 · Home “Pending approvals” says what is being approved, not just who asked tests/feedback/general/general.spec.ts:26

SHR-016 · after sending, the screen names the current approver and links to where the request is tracked

Error: the confirmation names who has the request now

expect(received).toMatch(expected)

Expected pattern: /QA Manager/
Received string:  "Request sent 🎉·
1 day of floating holidays, 20 Jan. Watch “My leave” for the decision.·
Apply for another"
Error: the confirmation shows the pending stage

expect(received).toMatch(expected)

Expected pattern: /Manager approval|with your manager|Awaiting/i
Received string:  "Request sent 🎉·
1 day of floating holidays, 20 Jan. Watch “My leave” for the decision.·
Apply for another"
Error: a link or button to track the request (the panel reads: "Request sent 🎉 1 day of floating holidays, 20 Jan. Watch “My leave” for the decision. Apply for another")

expect(received).toBeGreaterThan(expected)

Expected: > 0
Received:   0

• ✗ SHR-016 · after sending, the screen names the current approver and links to where the request is tracked tests/feedback/leave/leave-journeys.spec.ts:28
• ✓ SHR-016 · My leave shows the current approver and the pending stage of a request tests/feedback/leave/leave-journeys.spec.ts:52

SHR-018 · no female employee holds a Paternity Leave balance

Error: female employees holding paternity leave (e.g. Kavya Raghunathan)

expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality

- Expected  - 1
+ Received  + 4

- Array []
+ Array [
+   "Kavya Raghunathan: Paternity 5 days",
+   "Test Interviewer One: Paternity 5 days",
+ ]

• ✓ SHR-018 · a female employee is not offered Paternity Leave tests/feedback/leave/leave-rules.spec.ts:139
• ✗ SHR-018 · no female employee holds a Paternity Leave balance tests/feedback/leave/leave-rules.spec.ts:145

SHR-019 · bereavement and wedding leave are not carried forward and expire

Error: BLE: carry-forward limit is 0 (rule is {})

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: 0
Received: undefined
Error: BLE: an expiry period is set (rule is {})

expect(received).toBeTruthy()

Received: undefined
Error: WEDDING-LEAVE: carry-forward limit is 0 (rule is {})

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: 0
Received: undefined
Error: WEDDING-LEAVE: an expiry period is set (rule is {})

expect(received).toBeTruthy()

Received: undefined

SHR-019 · Wedding Leave is capped at 7 days

Error: days per request (rule {"allowHalfDay":true,"minNoticeDays":30,"permanentOnly":true,"afterProbation":true,"maxDaysPerYear":7,"oncePerService":true,"minTenureMonths":12,"countCalendarDays":false,"maxConsecutiveDays":10,"noticeExemptWhenEmergency":false})

expect(received).toBeLessThanOrEqual(expected)

Expected: <= 7
Received:    10

• ✓ SHR-019 · nobody holds more than 10 days of Bereavement or 7 days of Wedding leave tests/feedback/leave/leave-rules.spec.ts:227
• ✗ SHR-019 · bereavement and wedding leave are not carried forward and expire tests/feedback/leave/leave-rules.spec.ts:236
• ✗ SHR-019 · Wedding Leave is capped at 7 days tests/feedback/leave/leave-rules.spec.ts:250

SHR-020 · the form refuses Bereavement Leave of more than 10 days

Error: a message naming the 10-day limit

expect(locator).toBeVisible() failed

Locator: locator('#main-content').getByText(/10 days|more than 10|at most 10|maximum/i)
Expected: visible
Timeout: 10000ms
Error: element(s) not found

Call log:
  - a message naming the 10-day limit locator('#main-content').getByText(/10 days|more than 10|at most 10|maximum/i) with timeout 10000ms
  - waiting for locator('#main-content').getByText(/10 days|more than 10|at most 10|maximum/i)

• ✓ SHR-020 · a request of 3 days or more needs the manager and then the department head tests/feedback/leave/leave-journeys.spec.ts:91
• ✗ SHR-020 · the form refuses Bereavement Leave of more than 10 days tests/feedback/leave/leave-journeys.spec.ts:133
• ✓ SHR-020 · the server refuses Bereavement Leave of more than 10 days tests/feedback/leave/leave-journeys.spec.ts:144
• ✓ SHR-020 · Bereavement Leave is capped at 10 days per request (policy) tests/feedback/leave/leave-rules.spec.ts:245

SHR-068 · cancelling approved leave goes to the reporting manager instead of being approved automatically

Error: the cancellation of approved leave (run 076ac041-50d1-4335-a32e-2877a0d99e0a)

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: "manager task"
Received: "leave cancelled and the day credited back without the manager (cancellation request shows \"approved\")"

• ✗ SHR-068 · cancelling approved leave goes to the reporting manager instead of being approved automatically tests/feedback/leave/leave-journeys.spec.ts:215

SHR-085 · Floating Holidays are credited only 30 days after the joining date

Error: QA Employee Two joined 2026-10-01: Floating Holiday credits before 2026-10-31

expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality

- Expected  - 1
+ Received  + 3

- Array []
+ Array [
+   "2026-10-09 +2.00 policy_entitlement:2026",
+ ]

SHR-085 · PTO is first credited on the 1st of the month after joining

Error: QA Employee Two joined 2026-10-01: PTO credits before 2026-11-01 or for the joining month

expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality

- Expected  - 1
+ Received  + 3

- Array []
+ Array [
+   "2026-10-09 +1.25 policy_entitlement:2026-10",
+ ]

• ✗ SHR-085 · Floating Holidays are credited only 30 days after the joining date tests/feedback/leave/leave-rules.spec.ts:287
• ✗ SHR-085 · PTO is first credited on the 1st of the month after joining tests/feedback/leave/leave-rules.spec.ts:295
• ✓ SHR-085 · Wedding Leave is assigned by HR only, never accrued automatically tests/feedback/leave/leave-rules.spec.ts:305

SHR-086 · a comp-off request for a weekend day worked reaches the manager instead of being rejected at once

Error: comp-off for Saturday 2026-10-10

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: "manager task"
Received: "the request ended \"rejected\" without anyone deciding"

• ✗ SHR-086 · a comp-off request for a weekend day worked reaches the manager instead of being rejected at once tests/feedback/leave/leave-journeys.spec.ts:289
• ✓ SHR-086 · an employee can request comp-off for a day worked tests/feedback/leave/leave-rules.spec.ts:182

SHR-087 · leave without pay of more than 3 days goes to the department head after the manager, not straight to HR

Error: after the manager the run went to hr_approval (14 HR tasks)

expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality

- Expected  - 1
+ Received  + 1

  Array [
-   "dept_head_approval",
+   "hr_approval",
  ]

SHR-087 · leave without pay of more than 3 days also needs the department head

Error: Leave Without Pay chain is mgr_approval (manager_or_hr_partner) → hr_approval (hr_partner)

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: true
Received: false

• ✓ SHR-087 · PTO of more than 3 days goes to the department head after the manager approves tests/feedback/leave/leave-journeys.spec.ts:75
• ✗ SHR-087 · leave without pay of more than 3 days goes to the department head after the manager, not straight to HR tests/feedback/leave/leave-journeys.spec.ts:106
• ✓ SHR-087 · leave of more than 3 days goes to the department head after the manager (Annual Leave Approval) tests/feedback/leave/leave-rules.spec.ts:314
• ✗ SHR-087 · leave without pay of more than 3 days also needs the department head tests/feedback/leave/leave-rules.spec.ts:322

SHR-091 · PTO more than 90 days ahead is refused

Error: PTO on 2027-01-28 (more than 90 days ahead): server answered 201 {"id":"b9609f2c-55bb-457e-998a-9a8338be0a9c","workflowInstanceId":"4abc1e0a-e419-4b5b-9f81-8d8641ad481c","units":0.5,"breakdown":{"units":0.5,"calendarDays":1,"

expect(received).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(expected)

Expected: >= 400
Received:    201

SHR-091 · the form refuses leave dates more than 90 days ahead (PTO)

Error: PTO on 2027-01-25 (100+ days ahead) should be blocked with a 90-day message; the form offers "Send request"

expect(received).toMatchObject(expected)

- Expected  - 1
+ Received  + 1

  Object {
-   "sendEnabled": false,
+   "sendEnabled": true,
  }

• ✗ SHR-091 · PTO more than 90 days ahead is refused tests/feedback/leave/leave-journeys.spec.ts:254
• ✓ SHR-091 · Bereavement Leave more than 90 days ahead is still accepted (exempt) tests/feedback/leave/leave-journeys.spec.ts:263
• ✗ SHR-091 · the form refuses leave dates more than 90 days ahead (PTO) tests/feedback/leave/leave-rules.spec.ts:115

SHR-092 · comp-off for a regular working day is refused

Error: comp-off for 2026-10-13 (a working day) was accepted: {"id":"e56451c6-4a92-4ceb-9dc8-e1e718975797","workflowInstanceId":"95cabf4c-44ef-4d4c-86fc-f7474c0ba36e","units":1,"breakdown":null,"lop":null,"policy":{"id":"e

expect(received).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(expected)

Expected: >= 400
Received:    201

SHR-092 · comp-off requests go Reporting manager → Department head → HR SPOC → HR head

Error: Comp-Off Request chain is mgr_compoff (manager_or_hr_partner)

expect(received).toHaveLength(expected)

Expected length: 4
Received length: 1
Received array:  ["mgr_compoff (manager_or_hr_partner)"]

• ✗ SHR-092 · comp-off for a regular working day is refused tests/feedback/leave/leave-journeys.spec.ts:274
• ✗ SHR-092 · comp-off requests go Reporting manager → Department head → HR SPOC → HR head tests/feedback/leave/leave-rules.spec.ts:328

SHR-093 · a second-half leave is recorded as the second half

Error: the half the employee asked for

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: "second_half"
Received: "first_half"

SHR-093 · a half-day request lets the employee choose First half or Second half

Error: a First half / Second half choice on the form (only a "Just a half day" switch exists)

expect(received).toBeGreaterThan(expected)

Expected: > 0
Received:   0

SHR-093 · the "Just a half day" switch turns on and the request becomes half a day

Error: the switch stays on after it is clicked

expect(locator).toHaveAttribute(expected) failed

Locator:  locator('#main-content').getByRole('switch')
Expected: "true"
Received: "false"
Timeout:  10000ms

Call log:
  - the switch stays on after it is clicked locator('#main-content').getByRole('switch') with timeout 10000ms
  - waiting for locator('#main-content').getByRole('switch')
    24 × locator resolved to <button value="on" type="button" role="switch" aria-checked="false" aria-label="Half day" data-state="unchecked" class="inline-flex shrink-0 items-center rounded-full border border-transparent transition-colors bg-surface-3 data-[state=checked]:bg-brand aria-checked:bg-brand disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50 h-5 w-9">…</button>
       - unexpected value "false"

• ✗ SHR-093 · a second-half leave is recorded as the second half tests/feedback/leave/leave-journeys.spec.ts:310
• ✗ SHR-093 · a half-day request lets the employee choose First half or Second half tests/feedback/leave/leave-rules.spec.ts:94
• ✗ SHR-093 · the "Just a half day" switch turns on and the request becomes half a day tests/feedback/leave/leave-rules.spec.ts:103

SHR-094 · a corrected (regularised) day is colour-coded and labelled as corrected

Error: the calendar legend has a colour for corrected / regularised days (it lists Present, WFH, Half day, Absent, Leave, Holiday, No record only)

expect(received).toMatch(expected)

Expected pattern: /regulari[sz]ed|corrected/i
Received string:  "My attendance·
Your month at a glance — corrections take a minute if something looks off.·
Request a correction
Leave
Attendance
Overtime & comp-off·
Thursday 15 October·
Clocked out at 7:13 AM·
Clock in again·
0:04:07·
8h 25m to a full 8.5h day·
12 AM
General Shift 10:00 AM – 7:00 PM
8 PM
12:35 AM – 12:35 AM · 0m
12:36 AM – 12:37 AM · 0m
12:40 AM – 12:41 AM · 1m
1:41 AM – 1:41 AM · 0m
1:41 AM – 1:41 AM · 0m
1:41 AM – 1:41 AM · 0m
1:50 AM – 1:50 AM · 0m
1:51 AM – 1:51 AM · 0m
1:53 AM – 1:53 AM · 0m
1:53 AM – 1:53 AM · 0m
1:53 AM – 1:53 AM · 0m
3:04 AM – 3:04 AM · 0m
3:04 AM – 3:04 AM · 0m
3:04 AM – 3:04 AM · 0m
5:04 AM – 5:04 AM · 0m
5:04 AM – 5:04 AM · 0m
5:04 AM – 5:04 AM · 0m
6:09 AM – 6:09 AM · 0m
6:09 AM – 6:09 AM · 0m
6:09 AM – 6:10 AM · 0m
7:12 AM – 7:12 AM · 0m

• ✗ SHR-094 · a corrected (regularised) day is colour-coded and labelled as corrected tests/feedback/attendance/attendance-pr.spec.ts:106

SHR-122 · special leave types with no credited balance are hidden from the employee

Error: special leave types offered with 0 balance (should appear only once HR credits them)

expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality

- Expected  - 1
+ Received  + 6

- Array []
+ Array [
+   "Bereavement Leave",
+   "Examination Leave",
+   "Paternity Leave",
+   "Wedding Leave",
+ ]

• ✗ SHR-122 · special leave types with no credited balance are hidden from the employee tests/feedback/leave/leave-rules.spec.ts:152
• ✓ SHR-122 · a special leave HR has credited is offered to the employee tests/feedback/leave/leave-rules.spec.ts:160

SHR-046 · no male employee holds a Maternity Leave balance

Error: male employees holding maternity leave

expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality

- Expected  - 1
+ Received  + 4

- Array []
+ Array [
+   "Aarav Krishnamurthy.: Maternity 182 days",
+   "Test Interviewer Two: Maternity 182 days",
+ ]

SHR-046 · picking Maternity Leave and a start date fills the end date 182 days later

Error: To date auto-filled as 2027-06-20 (the form leaves "Pick a date")

expect(locator).toBeVisible() failed

Locator: locator('#main-content').getByText(/^20 \w{3} 2027$/)
Expected: visible
Timeout: 10000ms
Error: element(s) not found

Call log:
  - To date auto-filled as 2027-06-20 (the form leaves "Pick a date") locator('#main-content').getByText(/^20 \w{3} 2027$/) with timeout 10000ms
  - waiting for locator('#main-content').getByText(/^20 \w{3} 2027$/)

• ✓ SHR-046 · a male employee is not offered Maternity Leave tests/feedback/leave/leave-rules.spec.ts:169
• ✗ SHR-046 · no male employee holds a Maternity Leave balance tests/feedback/leave/leave-rules.spec.ts:175
• ✓ SHR-046 · maternity leave is counted as 182 continuous calendar days, weekends and holidays included tests/feedback/leave/leave-rules.spec.ts:197
• ✗ SHR-046 · picking Maternity Leave and a start date fills the end date 182 days later tests/feedback/leave/leave-rules.spec.ts:207

SHR-047 · a maternity request reaches the reporting manager first, then the department head

Error: first approval step (14 people got a task)

expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality

- Expected  - 1
+ Received  + 1

  Array [
-   "mgr_approval",
+   "hr_approval",
  ]

SHR-047 · maternity leave goes to the reporting manager, then the department head

Error: approval chain of Maternity Leave Approval

expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality

- Expected  - 2
+ Received  + 1

  Array [
-   StringMatching /^mgr.*\(manager/,
-   StringMatching /dept_head|department_head/,
+   "hr_approval (hr_partner)",
  ]

• ✗ SHR-047 · a maternity request reaches the reporting manager first, then the department head tests/feedback/leave/leave-journeys.spec.ts:184
• ✓ SHR-047 · when HR rejects a maternity request it ends rejected for the employee and nobody else can approve it tests/feedback/leave/leave-journeys.spec.ts:197
• ✗ SHR-047 · maternity leave goes to the reporting manager, then the department head tests/feedback/leave/leave-rules.spec.ts:219

SHR-084 · no location sits in one geography with an address in another @pr

Error: locations whose address is in another country than their jurisdiction

expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality

- Expected  - 1
+ Received  + 3

- Array []
+ Array [
+   "\"Los Angeles\" (California, America/Los_Angeles) has its address in Bangalore",
+ ]

SHR-084 · the platform refuses a California location whose address is in Bangalore @journey

Error: a California office with a Bangalore address is refused — the API answered 201

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: 400
Received: 201

• ✗ SHR-084 · no location sits in one geography with an address in another @pr tests/feedback/organization/organization.spec.ts:125
• ✗ SHR-084 · the platform refuses a California location whose address is in Bangalore @journey tests/feedback/organization/organization.spec.ts:133

SHR-088 · an employee in California cannot be placed at a location in Telangana

Error: California + Hyderabad HQ is refused — instead the form sent it and the server accepted every field (it only refused the employee number the test swapped in, so nothing was saved)

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: true
Received: false

• ✗ SHR-088 · an employee in California cannot be placed at a location in Telangana tests/feedback/employee-creation/new-employee-form.spec.ts:103

SHR-089 · the emergency contact cannot have the employee's own name

Error: "FB Test Hire Abdbdj" as both employee and emergency contact is refused — instead the form sent it and the server accepted every field (it only refused the employee number the test swapped in, so nothing was saved)

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: true
Received: false

SHR-089 · the personal email cannot be the same as the official (work) email

Error: one address as both work and personal email is refused — instead the form sent it and the server accepted every field (it only refused the employee number the test swapped in, so nothing was saved)

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: true
Received: false

• ✗ SHR-089 · the emergency contact cannot have the employee's own name tests/feedback/employee-creation/new-employee-form.spec.ts:115
• ✗ SHR-089 · the personal email cannot be the same as the official (work) email tests/feedback/employee-creation/new-employee-form.spec.ts:126

SHR-119 · the Employees table can be filtered by joining date

Error: a joining/hire date filter next to: Filter by department, Filter by position, Filter by location, Filter by status

expect(received).toBeGreaterThan(expected)

Expected: > 0
Received:   0

SHR-119 · the Employees table shows and filters by entity (organisation) name

Error: an Entity / Organisation column among: COLUMNS, 10, Type, Manager, Status, Sign-in, Department, Position, Location, Jurisdiction, Joined, Reset columns, SAVED VIEWS, 1

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: true
Received: false

SHR-119 · the Employees table can be downloaded

Error: an Export / Download control for the table (Options offers: COLUMNS | 10 | SAVED VIEWS | 1)

expect(received).toBeGreaterThan(expected)

Expected: > 0
Received:   0

• ✓ SHR-119 · the Employees table can show the joining date tests/feedback/organization/organization.spec.ts:160
• ✗ SHR-119 · the Employees table can be filtered by joining date tests/feedback/organization/organization.spec.ts:167
• ✗ SHR-119 · the Employees table shows and filters by entity (organisation) name tests/feedback/organization/organization.spec.ts:178
• ✗ SHR-119 · the Employees table can be downloaded tests/feedback/organization/organization.spec.ts:188

SHR-109 · a resignation or exit is not posted in Announcements

Error: QA Admin’s Announcements page shows no "last day with the team" post

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: 0
Received: 2
Error: no exit is announced in the feed (route it to the Inbox of the group instead)

expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality

- Expected  - 1
+ Received  + 4

- Array []
+ Array [
+   "\"A change in the team\" —  Single Test One's last day with the team is 2026-10-16. Their work passes to the colleagu… (audience Administration, 2026-10-12)",
+   "\"A change in the team\" —  Bulk Test One's last day with the team is 2026-11-11. Their work passes to the colleagues… (audience Administration, 2026-10-12)",
+ ]

• ✗ SHR-109 · a resignation or exit is not posted in Announcements tests/feedback/exit/exit-forms.spec.ts:145

SHR-118 · the Home Celebrations card of HR and managers includes birthdays, not only work anniversaries

Error: admin: Celebrations reads "Celebrations / Quiet week / Work anniversaries show up here a week ahead." — birthdays are not part of it

expect(received).toMatch(expected)

Expected pattern: /birthday/i
Received string:  "Celebrations / Quiet week / Work anniversaries show up here a week ahead."

• ✓ SHR-118 · employees see birthdays and service anniversaries on their Home tests/feedback/general/general.spec.ts:77
• ✗ SHR-118 · the Home Celebrations card of HR and managers includes birthdays, not only work anniversaries tests/feedback/general/general.spec.ts:88
• – SHR-118 · a colleague’s birthday or service anniversary in the coming week is shown tests/feedback/general/general.spec.ts:99

SHR-025 · the "offer released" mail reads "Offer released for <candidate> for <designation> at <company>"

Error: the internal offer-released subject starts "Offer released for" (it is "{{ candidate.full_name }} has accepted the offer for {{ job_post.title }}")

expect(received).toMatch(expected)

Expected pattern: /^Offer released for /i
Received string:  "{{ candidate.full_name }} has accepted the offer for {{ job_post.title }}"
Error: it names the company

expect(received).toMatch(expected)

Expected pattern: /company\.(legal_)?name/
Received string:  "{{ candidate.full_name }} has accepted the offer for {{ job_post.title }}"

• ✗ SHR-025 · the "offer released" mail reads "Offer released for <candidate> for <designation> at <company>" tests/feedback/recruitment-offer/offer-pr.spec.ts:74

SHR-049 · the server refuses a hiring manager from another department

Error: a Delivery requisition with Aarav Krishnamurthy. (Executive Office) as hiring manager is refused (got 201)

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: 400
Received: 201

• ✓ SHR-049 · the hiring manager list shows only people of the position’s department tests/feedback/recruitment-requisition/form.spec.ts:65
• ✗ SHR-049 · the server refuses a hiring manager from another department tests/feedback/recruitment-requisition/form.spec.ts:157

SHR-059 · the offer approval goes to the HR Head, whatever the department

Error: OFR-2026-0083 · FB Test Pipeline 1015064007 · joining Tuesday 1 December waits on QA Manager, routed by role HR Head

expect(received).toMatch(expected)

Expected pattern: /hr-head/
Received string:  "relationship:requisition_hiring_manager"
Error: OFR-2026-0082 · FB Test Pipeline 1015053155 · joining Tuesday 1 December waits on QA Manager, routed by role HR Head

expect(received).toMatch(expected)

Expected pattern: /hr-head/
Received string:  "relationship:requisition_hiring_manager"
Error: OFR-2026-0081 · FB Test Pipeline 1015034909 · joining Tuesday 1 December waits on QA Manager, routed by role HR Head

expect(received).toMatch(expected)

Expected pattern: /hr-head/
Received string:  "relationship:requisition_hiring_manager"
Error: OFR-2026-0079 · Delivery Manager · joining Monday 26 October waits on Test Hiring Manager, routed by role HR Head

expect(received).toMatch(expected)

Expected pattern: /hr-head/
Received string:  "relationship:requisition_hiring_manager"

• ✓ SHR-059 · the approval goes to the HR Head (the role is in Delivery) tests/feedback/recruitment-offer/offer-journey.spec.ts:57
• ✗ SHR-059 · the offer approval goes to the HR Head, whatever the department tests/feedback/recruitment-offer/offer-pr.spec.ts:14

SHR-060 · the HR Head's approval panel shows role, department, entity, CTC and date of joining

Error: the approval panel shows the department

expect(received).toMatch(expected)

Expected pattern: /Delivery/
Received string:  "Fbtest Candidate ahegfe·
Offer approval·
CANDIDATE
Fbtest Candidate ahegfe
REQUEST
Fbtest Candidate ahegfe
DETAILS
FB Test Pipeline 1015074654 · offer OFR-2026-0084 · at HR Head approves the offer
WAITING SINCE
today, 7:50 am
DUE
23 Oct, 12:00 pm
ROLE
FB Test Pipeline 1015074654
OFFER
OFR-2026-0084
JOINING DATE
1 Dec 2026
ANNUAL CTC
₹9,00,000 a year
Approve
Decline
Request changes"
Error: the approval panel shows the entity

expect(received).toMatch(expected)

Expected pattern: /OpsMaven Services|Ops Maven/
Received string:  "Fbtest Candidate ahegfe·
Offer approval·
CANDIDATE
Fbtest Candidate ahegfe
REQUEST
Fbtest Candidate ahegfe
DETAILS

SHR-060 · the offer approval shows role, department, entity, CTC and date of joining

Error: the approval item "Fbtest Candidate ahegfe · OFR-2026-0084 · FB Test Pipeline 1015074654 · joining Tuesday 1 December" names the department

expect(received).toMatch(expected)

Expected pattern: /Delivery/i
Received string:  "Fbtest Candidate ahegfe · OFR-2026-0084 ·  · joining Tuesday 1 December"
Error: the approval item "Fbtest Candidate ahegfe · OFR-2026-0084 · FB Test Pipeline 1015074654 · joining Tuesday 1 December" names the entity (OpsMaven Services Pvt. Ltd.)

expect(received).toMatch(expected)

Expected pattern: /OpsMaven Services|Ops Maven/i
Received string:  "Fbtest Candidate ahegfe · OFR-2026-0084 · FB Test Pipeline 1015074654 · joining Tuesday 1 December"
Error: the approval item "Fbtest Candidate ahegfe · OFR-2026-0084 · FB Test Pipeline 1015074654 · joining Tuesday 1 December" names the CTC

expect(received).toMatch(expected)

Expected pattern: /(₹|INR|Rs\.?)\s?9|900000|\bCTC\b/i
Received string:  "Fbtest Candidate ahegfe · OFR-2026-0084 · FB Test Pipeline 1015074654 · joining Tuesday 1 December"

• ✗ SHR-060 · the HR Head's approval panel shows role, department, entity, CTC and date of joining tests/feedback/recruitment-offer/offer-journey.spec.ts:70
• ✗ SHR-060 · the offer approval shows role, department, entity, CTC and date of joining tests/feedback/recruitment-offer/offer-pr.spec.ts:39

SHR-072 · the approval progress of a sent-back requisition does not claim it was approved

Error: the progress block reads: "Raised Approved Oct 15, 2026 Approval chain Approved Open for sourcing Queued No approval workflow is set up for this yet."

expect(received).not.toMatch(expected)

Expected pattern: not /\bApproved\b/
Received string:      "Raised

Approved
Oct 15, 2026

Approval chain

Approved

Open for sourcing

Queued

No approval workflow is set up for this yet."

SHR-072 · the hiring manager is told who sent it back

Error: exactly one notification per return (got: recruitment.requisition.returned | Changes requested: REQ-2026-0190 — FB Test Req 10150156 | The department head sent the requisition back with: "FB test: please make it two openings". Make the changes on the requisition and resubmit it. || recruitment.requisition.returned | FB Test Req 10150156 came back with questions | The requisition for FB Test Req 10150156 was returned rather than approved. Please answer the points on it and resubmit; nothing moves until you do.)

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: 1
Received: 2

• ✓ SHR-072 · a requisition sent back shows "Changes requested" and the approver’s comment to the hiring manager tests/feedback/recruitment-requisition/approval.spec.ts:250
• ✗ SHR-072 · the approval progress of a sent-back requisition does not claim it was approved tests/feedback/recruitment-requisition/approval.spec.ts:260
• ✗ SHR-072 · the hiring manager is told who sent it back tests/feedback/recruitment-requisition/approval.spec.ts:269

SHR-073 · the recruiters are told when the department head approves

Error: the recruiter (hrm) got any notice about REQ-2026-0190 after the department head approved

expect(received).toBeGreaterThan(expected)

Expected: > 0
Received:   0

SHR-073 · once approved, the HR Head, hiring manager and recruiters are all told

Error: hrh got "requisition approved" (has: workflow.approval_request, recruitment.requisition.dept_head_approved, workflow.approval_request, recruitment.requisition.dept_head_approved)

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: true
Received: false

• ✓ SHR-073 · the hiring manager and the HR Head are told when the department head approves tests/feedback/recruitment-requisition/approval.spec.ts:307
• ✗ SHR-073 · the recruiters are told when the department head approves tests/feedback/recruitment-requisition/approval.spec.ts:315
• ✗ SHR-073 · once approved, the HR Head, hiring manager and recruiters are all told tests/feedback/recruitment-requisition/approval.spec.ts:322

SHR-074 · the hiring manager cannot post the job or run sourcing; that is the recruiter’s job

Error: hiring manager's buttons: Post this role, Tweak items, Start sourcing

expect(received).not.toContain(expected) // indexOf

Expected value: not "Post this role"
Received array:     ["Post this role", "Tweak items", "Start sourcing"]

• ✓ SHR-074 · after approval the hiring manager is notified and sees the approval details on the requisition tests/feedback/recruitment-requisition/approval.spec.ts:338
• ✗ SHR-074 · the hiring manager cannot post the job or run sourcing; that is the recruiter’s job tests/feedback/recruitment-requisition/approval.spec.ts:348

SHR-076 · recruitment has no pre-onboarding checklist (HR Operations owns it per geography)

Error: the post form asks for no pre-onboarding checklist

expect(locator).toHaveCount(expected) failed

Locator:  getByRole('dialog').filter({ hasText: 'Posts hang off an approved requisition' }).getByText('Pre-onboarding checklist', { exact: true })
Expected: 0
Received: 1
Timeout:  30000ms

Call log:
  - the post form asks for no pre-onboarding checklist getByRole('dialog').filter({ hasText: 'Posts hang off an approved requisition' }).getByText('Pre-onboarding checklist', { exact: true }) with timeout 30000ms
  - waiting for getByRole('dialog').filter({ hasText: 'Posts hang off an approved requisition' }).getByText('Pre-onboarding checklist', { exact: true })
    63 × locator resolved to 1 element
       - unexpected value "1"

Error: Recruitment has no Pre-onboarding tab

expect(locator).toHaveCount(expected) failed

Locator:  locator('#main-content').getByRole('link', { name: 'Pre-onboarding', exact: true }).or(locator('#main-content').getByRole('tab', { name: 'Pre-onboarding' }))
Expected: 0
Received: 1
Timeout:  30000ms

Call log:
  - Recruitment has no Pre-onboarding tab locator('#main-content').getByRole('link', { name: 'Pre-onboarding', exact: true }).or(locator('#main-content').getByRole('tab', { name: 'Pre-onboarding' })) with timeout 30000ms
  - waiting for locator('#main-content').getByRole('link', { name: 'Pre-onboarding', exact: true }).or(locator('#main-content').getByRole('tab', { name: 'Pre-onboarding' }))
    63 × locator resolved to 1 element
       - unexpected value "1"

• ✗ SHR-076 · recruitment has no pre-onboarding checklist (HR Operations owns it per geography) tests/feedback/recruitment-pipeline/pipeline-pr.spec.ts:120

SHR-078 · the latest interview reminder email gives the interview time in IST, not UTC

Error: "Your interview for FB Test Pipeline 1015073354 is tomorrow" (2026-10-15T02:05:23.384Z) for an interview at 2026-10-15 02:08:00+00 (= 7:38 am IST) should state 7:38 am; it says: Dear Fbtest Candidate ahddfe,

A reminder that your FB T1 round interview for FB Test Pipeline 1015073354 with OpsMaven Services Pvt. Ltd. is tomorrow at 15 Oct 2026, 2:08 am, at the place confirmed with you.

Please keep an identity document and a copy of you

expect(received).toMatch(expected)

Expected pattern: /7:38\s*am/i
Received string:  "Dear Fbtest Candidate ahddfe,·
A reminder that your FB T1 round interview for FB Test Pipeline 1015073354 with OpsMaven Services Pvt. Ltd. is tomorrow at 15 Oct 2026, 2:08 am, at the place confirmed with you.·
Please keep an identity document and a copy of your resume to hand.·
If anything has changed, reply to this email or write to qa.hrmanager@opsmaven.test today."

• ✗ SHR-078 · the latest interview reminder email gives the interview time in IST, not UTC tests/feedback/recruitment-pipeline/pipeline-pr.spec.ts:71

SHR-079 · the interview can carry a meeting link of our choice (Teams, Google Meet)

Error: the Schedule dialog has a field for the meeting link (it offers only Mode: Video / Onsite / Phone; the API accepts "locationOrLink" but the form never sends it)

expect(locator).toBeVisible() failed

Locator: getByRole('dialog', { name: /Schedule an interview/ }).getByLabel(/meeting link|location or link|join link|video link/i)
Expected: visible
Timeout: 5000ms
Error: element(s) not found

Call log:
  - the Schedule dialog has a field for the meeting link (it offers only Mode: Video / Onsite / Phone; the API accepts "locationOrLink" but the form never sends it) getByRole('dialog', { name: /Schedule an interview/ }).getByLabel(/meeting link|location or link|join link|video link/i) with timeout 5000ms
  - waiting for getByRole('dialog', { name: /Schedule an interview/ }).getByLabel(/meeting link|location or link|join link|video link/i)

SHR-079 · candidate and interviewer get a reminder 15 minutes before the interview

Error: a reminder fires 15 minutes before the interview. Configured: "Sent by the scheduler within 24 hours of the interview." (candidate); interview-round timers [{"unit":"calendarDays","anchor":"interviewDate","offset":-1}] (the day before, to the candidate only)

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: true
Received: false

• ✗ SHR-079 · the interview can carry a meeting link of our choice (Teams, Google Meet) tests/feedback/recruitment-pipeline/pipeline-pr.spec.ts:182
• ✗ SHR-079 · candidate and interviewer get a reminder 15 minutes before the interview tests/feedback/recruitment-pipeline/pipeline-pr.spec.ts:193

SHR-081 · the interviewer's notification opens the interview and its feedback form

Error: the link opens "FB T2 round (too early)" for Fbtest Candidate ahddfe (it lands on the plain Approvals inbox and drops ?interview=; now at https://qa.satellitehr.com/company/82628593-49b6-4dad-ad2a-6b9472ab44fc/inbox)

expect(locator).toBeVisible() failed

Locator: getByText('FB T2 round (too early)', { exact: true }).first()
Expected: visible
Timeout: 10000ms
Error: element(s) not found

Call log:
  - the link opens "FB T2 round (too early)" for Fbtest Candidate ahddfe (it lands on the plain Approvals inbox and drops ?interview=; now at https://qa.satellitehr.com/company/82628593-49b6-4dad-ad2a-6b9472ab44fc/inbox) getByText('FB T2 round (too early)', { exact: true }).first() with timeout 10000ms
  - waiting for getByText('FB T2 round (too early)', { exact: true }).first()

• ✓ SHR-081 · the interviewer's notification opens the interview to give feedback tests/feedback/recruitment-pipeline/pipeline-journey.spec.ts:68
• ✗ SHR-081 · the interviewer's notification opens the interview and its feedback form tests/feedback/recruitment-pipeline/pipeline-pr.spec.ts:249

SHR-097 · the panelist (here also the hiring manager) finds the candidate in Recruitment to open the scorecard

Error: QA Manager chairs the FB T1 round and is the requisition's hiring manager, but Recruitment → Pipeline shows "0 candidates"

expect(locator).toBeVisible() failed

Locator: locator('#main-content').getByRole('button', { name: /^Fbtest Candidate ahddfe — open details/ }).first()
Expected: visible
Timeout: 30000ms
Error: element(s) not found

Call log:
  - QA Manager chairs the FB T1 round and is the requisition's hiring manager, but Recruitment → Pipeline shows "0 candidates" locator('#main-content').getByRole('button', { name: /^Fbtest Candidate ahddfe — open details/ }).first() with timeout 30000ms
  - waiting for locator('#main-content').getByRole('button', { name: /^Fbtest Candidate ahddfe — open details/ }).first()

• ✓ SHR-097 · panelists submit their scorecards once the interview has started, with no "Happened" step tests/feedback/recruitment-pipeline/pipeline-journey.spec.ts:89
• ✗ SHR-097 · the panelist (here also the hiring manager) finds the candidate in Recruitment to open the scorecard tests/feedback/recruitment-pipeline/pipeline-journey.spec.ts:95

SHR-100 · the raise form tells the requester every step the request will go through

Error: the form's "where it goes" line names /management|executive/i (it says: "Goes to the department head, then HR.")

expect(received).toMatch(expected)

Expected pattern: /management|executive/i
Received string:  "Goes to the department head, then HR."

• ✓ SHR-100 · a raised requisition shows its whole approval chain, in order, with the people at each step tests/feedback/recruitment-requisition/approval.spec.ts:294
• ✗ SHR-100 · the raise form tells the requester every step the request will go through tests/feedback/recruitment-requisition/form.spec.ts:141

SHR-104 · a requisition the recruiter raises on the hiring manager’s behalf goes to the HR Head only

Error: REQ-2026-0192, raised by the recruiter, is routed: Department Head endorses the headcount (current: Test Department Head) → Management approves the hire (pending: Vikram Raghavan, Aarav Krishnamurthy.) → HR Head approves the requisition (pending: Test HR Head, QA HR Head, Raju Rastogi, Kavya Raghunathan)

expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality

- Expected  - 0
+ Received  + 2

  Array [
+   "approval_department_head",
+   "approval_management",
    "approval_hr_head",
  ]

• ✗ SHR-104 · a requisition the recruiter raises on the hiring manager’s behalf goes to the HR Head only tests/feedback/recruitment-requisition/routing.spec.ts:8

SHR-110 · a talent-pool candidate can be moved to an open requisition

Error: expect(locator).toBeVisible() failed

Locator: locator('#main-content').getByText(/candidates? mentions?/)
Expected: visible
Timeout: 30000ms
Error: element(s) not found

Call log:
  - Expect "toBeVisible" locator('#main-content').getByText(/candidates? mentions?/) with timeout 30000ms
  - waiting for locator('#main-content').getByText(/candidates? mentions?/)

• ✗ SHR-110 · a talent-pool candidate can be moved to an open requisition tests/feedback/recruitment-pipeline/pipeline-pr.spec.ts:310

SHR-111 · an uploaded JD keeps its layout: headings, lists and bold come through as formatting, never as raw tags

Error: the JD title shows as a heading, not as the literal text "<h1>Delivery Manager</h1>"

expect(locator).not.toContainText(expected) failed

Locator: getByRole('dialog').filter({ hasText: 'Raise a requisition' }).last().locator('[contenteditable=true]').first()
Expected substring: not "<h1>"
Received string: "<h1>Delivery Manager</h1>We are looking for a Delivery Manager to run two client accounts.ResponsibilitiesOwn delivery plans and timelinesRun weekly client reviewsCoach a team of eight engineersRequirementsEight years of software deliveryStrong stakeholder managementLocation: Hyderabad HQ"
Timeout: 30000ms

Call log:
  - the JD title shows as a heading, not as the literal text "<h1>Delivery Manager</h1>" getByRole('dialog').filter({ hasText: 'Raise a requisition' }).last().locator('[contenteditable=true]').first() with timeout 30000ms
  - waiting for getByRole('dialog').filter({ hasText: 'Raise a requisition' }).last().locator('[contenteditable=true]').first()
    63 × locator resolved to <div tabindex="0" translate="no" contenteditable="true" aria-label="Job description" class="tiptap ProseMirror min-h-32 px-3 py-2 text-sm text-ink focus:outline-none [&_h2]:mt-3 [&_h2]:text-base [&_h2]:font-semibold [&_h3]:mt-2 [&_h3]:text-sm [&_h3]:font-semibold [&_h4]:mt-2 [&_h4]:text-sm [&_h4]:font-medium [&_p]:my-1 [&_ul]:my-1 [&_ul]:list-disc [&_ul]:pl-5 [&_ol]:my-1 [&_ol]:list-decimal [&_ol]:pl-5 [&_a]:underline">…</div>
       - unexpected value "<h1>Delivery Manager</h1>We are looking for a Delivery Manager to run two client accounts.ResponsibilitiesOwn delivery plans and timelinesRun weekly client reviewsCoach a team of eight engineersRequirementsEight years of software deliveryStrong stakeholder managementLocation: Hyderabad HQ"

• ✗ SHR-111 · an uploaded JD keeps its layout: headings, lists and bold come through as formatting, never as raw tags tests/feedback/recruitment-requisition/form.spec.ts:25

SHR-112 · the next round can't be scheduled before the previous round's feedback is in

Error: scheduling T2 while T1 feedback is pending: {"id":"58d6f79f-858c-418e-a769-0e0c9f938035","conflicts":[]}

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: 409
Received: 201

• ✗ SHR-112 · the next round can't be scheduled before the previous round's feedback is in tests/feedback/recruitment-pipeline/pipeline-journey.spec.ts:82

SHR-113 · the feedback reminder reaches the interviewer by email within 24 hours of the interview

Error: the reminder "ta_feedback_due" is a notification template ("Your feedback on {{ candidate.full_name }} is due today"), and the email channel of "Scorecard pending" is off for an interviewer (QA Manager), so no email goes out

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: true
Received: false

• ✓ SHR-113 · the interviewer is reminded when interview feedback is not in tests/feedback/recruitment-pipeline/pipeline-pr.spec.ts:288
• ✗ SHR-113 · the feedback reminder reaches the interviewer by email within 24 hours of the interview tests/feedback/recruitment-pipeline/pipeline-pr.spec.ts:296

SHR-114 · a candidate can be transferred to another role without starting over

TimeoutError: locator.waitFor: Timeout 90000ms exceeded.
Call log:
  - waiting for locator('#main-content') to be visible

• ✗ SHR-114 · a candidate can be transferred to another role without starting over tests/feedback/recruitment-pipeline/pipeline-pr.spec.ts:322

SHR-115 · parsed résumé details can be reviewed and corrected before the candidate is saved

Error: the first Import click shows the extracted name, email and phone for review instead of saving the candidate straight away

expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality

- Expected  - 1
+ Received  + 3

- Array []
+ Array [
+   "POST /api/company/talent/recruitment/candidates/bulk-import",
+ ]

• ✗ SHR-115 · parsed résumé details can be reviewed and corrected before the candidate is saved tests/feedback/recruitment-pipeline/pipeline-pr.spec.ts:334

SHR-116 · after changes are asked for, the resubmitted requisition goes straight back to the approver who asked

Error: the HR Head asked for the changes; the resubmitted run is with: approval_department_head

expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality

- Expected  - 1
+ Received  + 1

  Array [
-   "approval_hr_head",
+   "approval_department_head",
  ]

• ✗ SHR-116 · after changes are asked for, the resubmitted requisition goes straight back to the approver who asked tests/feedback/recruitment-requisition/approval.spec.ts:286

SHR-117 · reducing the headcount of an approved requisition goes through the approval chain again

Error: 2 → 1 openings: hiring manager PATCH 403 {"code":"REQUISITION_NOT_EDITABLE","message":"An approved requisition is edited by HR or the Super Admin","requestId":"f809cd23-46db-4fe9-92d9-67cfa1db5f29"}; HR PATCH 200 {"id":"1dc6c83d-e9e1-4c0d-88ca-ab08c856936f"}; afterwards status "approved", openings 1, new approval runs: 0

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: true
Received: false

SHR-117 · a hiring manager’s request to close a requisition goes through the approval chain

Error: Close requisition by the hiring manager → 200 {"id":"1dc6c83d-e9e1-4c0d-88ca-ab08c856936f","status":"closed"}; status "closed", approval runs started: 0

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: false
Received: true

• ✗ SHR-117 · reducing the headcount of an approved requisition goes through the approval chain again tests/feedback/recruitment-requisition/approval.spec.ts:376
• ✗ SHR-117 · a hiring manager’s request to close a requisition goes through the approval chain tests/feedback/recruitment-requisition/approval.spec.ts:385

SHR-120 · offers waiting for approval are in the HR Head's inbox

Error: every offer waiting for approval is in QA HR Head's inbox

expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality

- Expected  - 1
+ Received  + 9

- Array []
+ Array [
+   "OFR-2026-0083 · FB Test Pipeline 1015064007 · joining Tuesday 1 December (waiting on QA Manager)",
+   "OFR-2026-0082 · FB Test Pipeline 1015053155 · joining Tuesday 1 December (waiting on QA Manager)",
+   "OFR-2026-0081 · FB Test Pipeline 1015034909 · joining Tuesday 1 December (waiting on QA Manager)",
+   "OFR-2026-0079 · Delivery Manager · joining Monday 26 October (waiting on Test Hiring Manager)",
+   "OFR-2026-0072 · Sr. Associate · joining Monday 19 October (waiting on Aarav Krishnamurthy.)",
+   "OFR-2026-0066 · Recruiter · joining Thursday 8 October (waiting on Aarav Krishnamurthy.)",
+   "OFR-2026-0049 · Demo Probe Role · joining Monday 19 October (waiting on Aarav Krishnamurthy.)",
+ ]

• ✓ SHR-120 · QA HR Head finds the offer approval in the Inbox tests/feedback/recruitment-offer/offer-journey.spec.ts:64
• ✗ SHR-120 · offers waiting for approval are in the HR Head's inbox tests/feedback/recruitment-offer/offer-pr.spec.ts:29

SHR-126 · the recruiter reads each panelist's comments and written answers on the profile

Error: QA Manager's comments are visible

expect(locator).toBeVisible() failed

Locator: getByRole('dialog').filter({ hasText: 'INTERVIEWS' }).last().getByText('FB test overall comment by mgr').first()
Expected: visible
Timeout: 30000ms
Error: element(s) not found

Call log:
  - QA Manager's comments are visible getByRole('dialog').filter({ hasText: 'INTERVIEWS' }).last().getByText('FB test overall comment by mgr').first() with timeout 30000ms
  - waiting for getByRole('dialog').filter({ hasText: 'INTERVIEWS' }).last().getByText('FB test overall comment by mgr').first()

SHR-126 · the recruiter sees the full feedback: ratings, written answers, recommendation and comments

Error: QA Manager's written answer to "How did you find their body language?" ("FB test answer to: How did you find their body language?") on Fbtest Candidate ahddfe (FB T1 round) is shown. The interviews section shows only: INTERVIEWS / Schedule / T1 / FB T2 round (too early) / scheduled / Reschedule / Cancel interview / Oct 16, 2026, 7:36 AM / Panel: / QA Manager (chair) / Awaiting / T1 / FB T1 round / completed / Oct 15, 2026, 7:38 AM / Panel: / QA Manager (chair) / Submitted / Advance · 4/5 / QA Department Head / Submitted / Advance · 4/5

expect(received).toContain(expected) // indexOf

Expected value: "FB test answer to: How did you find their body language?"
Received array: ["INTERVIEWS", "", "Schedule", "T1", "FB T2 round (too early)", "scheduled", "Reschedule", "Cancel interview", "Oct 16, 2026, 7:36 AM", "", …]
Error: the overall comments "FB test overall comment by mgr" are shown

expect(received).toContain(expected) // indexOf

Expected value: "FB test overall comment by mgr"
Received array: ["INTERVIEWS", "", "Schedule", "T1", "FB T2 round (too early)", "scheduled", "Reschedule", "Cancel interview", "Oct 16, 2026, 7:36 AM", "", …]

• ✗ SHR-126 · the recruiter reads each panelist's comments and written answers on the profile tests/feedback/recruitment-pipeline/pipeline-journey.spec.ts:114
• ✗ SHR-126 · the recruiter sees the full feedback: ratings, written answers, recommendation and comments tests/feedback/recruitment-pipeline/pipeline-pr.spec.ts:259