# SatelliteHR e2e — bugs found

14 Oct 2026, 21:28 IST · **1 new failures · 14 open bugs · 7 sheet gaps · 1 now passing**

66 passed · 22 failed · 2 skipped · run failed

## New failures — drift or new bugs (1)

Not tied to a logged issue in the test. A baseline failure means the tenant configuration changed: the diff shows what. Triage each one: log it in ISSUES.md, revert the change, or accept it by updating the baseline.

### leave policies @pr › policy set matches the reviewed baseline

`tests/contract/policies.spec.ts:21`

```
Error: expect(string).toMatchSnapshot(expected) failed

  @@ -144,11 +144,11 @@
       "name": "Paid Time Off — handbook 16.1",
       "accrual": {
         "rate": 1.25,
         "frequency": "monthly",
         "proration": true,
  -      "waitingDays": 30
  +      "startNextMonth": true
       },
       "carryForward": {
         "maxDays": 30
       },
```


## Open bugs — still reproduce (14)

Logged in ISSUES.md. Each assertion states the correct behaviour; the error shows what the platform did instead.

### known bugs: data integrity @pr @known-bug › ISS-422 · punch times are stored as real UTC

**ISS-422: the server stores IST wall time with a Z suffix (5h30 ahead)**

https://satellitehr-qa-issues.pages.dev/ISS-422

`tests/contract/data-integrity.spec.ts:15`

```
Error: server "now" 2026-10-14T21:28:32Z vs real UTC 2026-10-14T15:58:32.538Z

expect(received).toBeLessThan(expected)

Expected: < 10
Received:   329.99103333333335
```

### known bugs: data integrity @pr @known-bug › ISS-440 · nobody is credited leave types restricted to another gender, or more than the yearly entitlement

**ISS-440: male employees hold Maternity Leave; Wedding/Floating/Bereavement credited twice**

https://satellitehr-qa-issues.pages.dev/ISS-440

`tests/contract/data-integrity.spec.ts:22`

```
Error: expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality

- Expected  - 1
+ Received  + 6

- Array []
+ Array [
+   "Aarav Krishnamurthy.: maternity 182",
+   "Kavya Raghunathan: paternity 5",
+   "Test Interviewer One: paternity 5",
+   "Test Interviewer Two: maternity 182",
+ ]
```

### known bugs: data integrity @pr @known-bug › ISS-446 · no PTO is credited before the policy’s waiting period ends

**ISS-446: a 1 Oct joiner was credited October PTO on 9 Oct, inside the waiting period (waitingDays 30, now startNextMonth)**

https://satellitehr-qa-issues.pages.dev/ISS-446

`tests/contract/data-integrity.spec.ts:45`

```
Error: expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality

- Expected  - 1
+ Received  + 3

- Array []
+ Array [
+   "2026-10-09 1.25 policy_entitlement:2026-10",
+ ]
```

### known bugs: data integrity @pr @known-bug › ISS-447 · the Service Leave policy form shows its rule without a validation error

**ISS-447: blank accrual and "Entitlement can't be negative" on open**

https://satellitehr-qa-issues.pages.dev/ISS-447

`tests/contract/data-integrity.spec.ts:73`

```
Error: expect(locator).toHaveCount(expected) failed

Locator:  getByRole('dialog').filter({ hasText: /Edit policy/ }).last().getByText(/Entitlement can't be negative/)
Expected: 0
Received: 1
Timeout:  30000ms

Call log:
  - Expect "toHaveCount" getByRole('dialog').filter({ hasText: /Edit policy/ }).last().getByText(/Entitlement can't be negative/) with timeout 30000ms
  - waiting for getByRole('dialog').filter({ hasText: /Edit policy/ }).last().getByText(/Entitlement can't be negative/)
    62 × locator resolved to 1 element
       - unexpected value "1"
```

### known gaps: permissions @pr @known-bug › ISS-444 · mgr can save the roster it is shown (rows 36–37)

**ISS-444: reporting managers, department heads and HR SPOC are refused (403) on roster saves**

https://satellitehr-qa-issues.pages.dev/ISS-444

`tests/contract/permissions.spec.ts:41`

```
Error: expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: false
Received: true
```

### known gaps: permissions @pr @known-bug › ISS-444 · dh can save the roster it is shown (rows 36–37)

**ISS-444: reporting managers, department heads and HR SPOC are refused (403) on roster saves**

https://satellitehr-qa-issues.pages.dev/ISS-444

`tests/contract/permissions.spec.ts:41`

```
Error: expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: false
Received: true
```

### known gaps: permissions @pr @known-bug › ISS-444 · spoc can save the roster it is shown (rows 36–37)

**ISS-444: reporting managers, department heads and HR SPOC are refused (403) on roster saves**

https://satellitehr-qa-issues.pages.dev/ISS-444

`tests/contract/permissions.spec.ts:41`

```
Error: expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: false
Received: true
```

### leave policies @pr › PTO: 1.25 days a month after 30 days, carry-forward 30, LOP fallback (rows 48–51, 60)

**ISS-450: since 14 Oct the PTO policy has startNextMonth instead of the 30-day waiting period**

https://satellitehr-qa-issues.pages.dev/ISS-450

`tests/contract/policies.spec.ts:28`

```
Error: expect(received).toMatchObject(expected)

- Expected  - 1
+ Received  + 0

  Object {
    "frequency": "monthly",
    "rate": 1.25,
-   "waitingDays": 30,
  }
```

### known bugs: workflows @pr @known-bug › ISS-452 · the long-leave threshold used by leave approval is a visible parameter

**ISS-452: routing works since 14 Oct, but param lv.long_leave_days is still not defined, so the 3-day threshold is a hidden default no one can see or change**

https://satellitehr-qa-issues.pages.dev/ISS-452

`tests/contract/workflows.spec.ts:105`

```
Error: expect(received).toContain(expected) // indexOf

Expected value: "lv.long_leave_days"
Received array: ["ext.ceo_pack_sla", "ext.clearance_trigger", "ext.counteroffer_issue_sla", "ext.counteroffer_response_sla", "ext.damage_assessment_sla", "ext.escalate_to_hr_sla", "ext.exit_docs_sla", "ext.ffs_clear_sla", "ext.ffs_gratuity_target", "ext.ffs_l1", …]
```

### known bugs: workflows @pr @known-bug › ISS-441 · earning comp-off does not require an existing comp-off balance

**ISS-441: Comp-Off Request rejects when employee.balance <= 0 and debits the ledger on approval**

https://satellitehr-qa-issues.pages.dev/ISS-441

`tests/contract/workflows.spec.ts:112`

```
Error: expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: false
Received: true
```

### regularization @journey › missed punch: manager approves and the day is rewritten (rows 4–5)

**ISS-455/456: worked hours are not recalculated after a late-arrival correction (1.07 h span reported as 0.57 h)**

https://satellitehr-qa-issues.pages.dev/ISS-455 · https://satellitehr-qa-issues.pages.dev/ISS-456

`tests/journeys/al01-al02-attendance.spec.ts:101`

```
Error: worked 0.57 h vs span 1.07 h (2026-10-13 09:45:00+00 → 2026-10-13 10:49:04+00)

expect(received).toBeLessThan(expected)

Expected: < 0.1
Received:   0.49777777777777776
```

### known bugs: leave @journey @known-bug › ISS-453 · a pending Leave Without Pay request can be withdrawn (row 18)

**ISS-453: withdrawing a pending LWP request is refused with 403 PROTECTED_RUN ("forced by the platform tier")**

https://satellitehr-qa-issues.pages.dev/ISS-453

`tests/journeys/al04-al05-leave.spec.ts:181`

```
Error: timed out waiting for request withdrawn
```

### known bugs: leave @journey @known-bug › ISS-437/439 · approved leave with confirmed unpaid days is posted and stays approved (row 15)

**ISS-437/439: post_ledger fails with "Insufficient balance" and the request ends rejected**

https://satellitehr-qa-issues.pages.dev/ISS-437 · https://satellitehr-qa-issues.pages.dev/ISS-439

`tests/journeys/al04-al05-leave.spec.ts:201`

```
Error: timed out waiting for request decided
```

### known bugs: comp-off @journey @known-bug › ISS-441 · a request to earn comp-off for a weekend reaches the manager (rows 29–30)

**ISS-441: Request comp-off is rejected for having no comp-off balance**

https://satellitehr-qa-issues.pages.dev/ISS-441

`tests/journeys/al08-al09-compoff-balances.spec.ts:35`

```
Error: timed out waiting for manager task
```


## Gaps against the workflow sheet (7)

The Attendance & Leave sheet asks for this; the platform does not do it (GAPS.md).

### known gaps: permissions @pr @known-bug › GAPS row 33 · HR SPOC can adjust special leave balances

**HR SPOC has no balance-adjust right on this tenant (GAPS.md row 33)**

GAPS.md row 33

`tests/contract/permissions.spec.ts:46`

```
Error: expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: false
Received: true
```

### known gaps: permissions @pr @known-bug › GAPS row 34 · HR SPOC can change leave configuration

**HR SPOC is view-only on leave policies on this tenant (GAPS.md row 34)**

GAPS.md row 34

`tests/contract/permissions.spec.ts:50`

```
Error: expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: false
Received: true
```

### known gaps: configuration @pr @known-bug › GAPS row 1 · days under 8 hours count as half days

**Half-day cut-off is 4 hours on this tenant; the sheet asks for 8 (GAPS.md row 1)**

`tests/contract/policies.spec.ts:76`

```
Error: expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: 8
Received: 4
```

### known gaps: work from home @journey @known-bug › GAPS row 22 · back-dated work from home is refused

**Back-dated WFH is accepted and sent to the manager (GAPS.md row 22)**

GAPS.md row 22

`tests/journeys/al06-wfh.spec.ts:79`

```
Error: expect(received).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(expected)

Expected: >= 400
Received:    201
```

### known gaps: work from home @journey @known-bug › GAPS row 25 · long WFH gets an HR SPOC review

**No HR SPOC step in the WFH workflow (GAPS.md row 25)**

GAPS.md row 25

`tests/journeys/al06-wfh.spec.ts:87`

```
Error: timed out waiting for HR SPOC task
```

### known gaps: shifts @journey @known-bug › GAPS row 43 · the teammate is asked to accept a swap first

**No peer acceptance: the swap goes straight to the manager (GAPS.md row 43)**

GAPS.md row 43

`tests/journeys/al10-al11-shifts.spec.ts:87`

```
Error: timed out waiting for teammate task
```

### known gaps: shifts @journey @known-bug › GAPS row 42 · a swap between identical shifts is refused

**Eligibility does not check identical shifts (GAPS.md row 42)**

GAPS.md row 42

`tests/journeys/al10-al11-shifts.spec.ts:100`

```
Error: expect(received).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(expected)

Expected: >= 400
Received:    201
```


## Now passing — bug no longer reproduces (1)

Confirm the fix, close the issue, and keep the test as a regression check.

### known bugs: data integrity @pr @known-bug › ISS-445 · "Your shift" shows the shift on a working day, not "Off today"

**ISS-445: the panel says "Off today — enjoy the day" on working days**

https://satellitehr-qa-issues.pages.dev/ISS-445

`tests/contract/data-integrity.spec.ts:62`